Tool version 1.0.0
Channel Comparison Board
Compares public facts for two to five channels without inventing private performance data.
Official API features require an API key configured by the site owner. No account sign-in is requested.
Quick answer
- What is it?
- Compares public facts for two to five channels without inventing private performance data.
- What does it accept?
- Two to five public channel identifiers and optional comparison date. Validate duplicates and resolve identifiers.
- What does it produce?
- Side by side facts, difference table, age adjusted views per year and CSV export with source timestamps.
Method
Inside the method
Server batches official API requests and normalizes public counts. Browser calculates clear differences and ratios.
Inputs
Before you begin
Two to five public channel identifiers and optional comparison date. Validate duplicates and resolve identifiers.
Results
Read the evidence
Side by side facts, difference table, age adjusted views per year and CSV export with source timestamps.
Advanced
Useful extras
Metric selection, local snapshots for later comparison and missing value handling that never converts hidden data to zero.
Limits
Known boundaries
Input quality, browser memory, remote server behavior and public API availability can affect a result. The finding describes the supplied material at the time of the test; it does not prove intent or future behavior.
FAQ
Questions about Channel Comparison Board
What does Channel Comparison Board accept?
Two to five public channel identifiers and optional comparison date. Validate duplicates and resolve identifiers.
How is the result produced?
Server batches official API requests and normalizes public counts. Browser calculates clear differences and ratios.
What will I receive?
Side by side facts, difference table, age adjusted views per year and CSV export with source timestamps.
Is the input private?
Official server API for public data. Local snapshots remain on the device by default.
What are the main limitations?
Results depend on the quality, completeness and public availability of the supplied input. Review the evidence before making a high-impact decision.